
Have a
plan going in
On
the rare occasions, Junior mining stocks can deliver truly
mind-boggling percentage gains and "life altering"
profits. Most times, they don't find the mother load, so by
their nature; exploration companies are extremely risky ventures.
But that doesn't mean there aren't profit opportunities in
them as well. Significant discoveries that never become mines
can still generate 5 to 10 bagger profit potential for shareholders
of the company making the discovery and sizeable gains for
the surrounding claim stakers as well depending on the significance
of the discovery. But if a person wades into this sector without
a plan, with no concept of where they are within the promotional
and sector cycles, they can lose big time.
To
start with, there's a time when we shouldn't bother with junior
mining stocks at all. Like starting in 1996 the year Bre-x
peaked and the following four years as metal prices declined
and technology took center stage. There's no speculative appeal
during a severe, prolonged bear market and therefore few if
any speculative profits to be had. But in 2000, the trends
completely reversed. Once it's determined that it's a good
time for the metals sector, then there's a matter of utilizing
a strategy to chose which juniors to buy and when to buy them.
By employing some strategies instead of going in and buying
haphazardly, with a little luck speculators can "mine"
enough gains to offset the inevitable losers. It's been a
number of years since we've played the junior mining stocks
and some subscribers might be new to the game, so I felt it
was time for a refresher since it looks like there's an across
the board revival getting underway in the metals markets.
Spreading
the risk, improving the odds The chances of determining which
stock will be the next Ekati Diamond Mine or Eskay Creek high
grade Gold mine are a thousand to one, maybe even less. A
truly rare event. It's very much an odds game. So to increase
the odds, a person might spread the total amount they want
to devote to the group over a basket of say, 3 to 10 carefully
chosen and timed stocks purchases. Ten juniors have ten times
the number of chances of hitting something sizeable than one.
The odds are still very low, but better. Carefully timing
acquisitions Unless one is as careful about WHEN they purchase
these juniors, as they are at selecting WHICH juniors they
buy, they could easily get burned. One might be attracted
to a story due to news at the time and buy high. The secret
here is to understand where the stock is in relation to its
promotional cycle and seasonal cycle. Many times it pays to
watch the stock for some time until the cycles are near their
lows. This reduces risk and improves the odds of taking out
some trading profits.
Another
way to look at this, albeit oversimplified, is to attempt
to buy as many of these juniors as you can as close as you
can to their annual lows. Pull up a chart on these penny stocks
and you'll see a multi-month period where the promoters simply
give up and throw in the towel. At one time, this used to
be simpler as most of the time this would happen in November
and December. But now with exploration occurring any time
of the year, these stocks often have lives of their own and
the annual lows could be at different times of the year. And
don't buy in the middle of a drilling program when the stock's
all hyped up but months before.
Selection
criteria. These are the characteristics we look for in promising
junior explorers. The stronger a company is in each of the
following areas, the more it is worth. The game is paying
the least amount possible for the greatest amount of quality
going for it.
1.
Management - I look for the following characteristics
in management; first they must be capable of finding deposits
based on their previous records of performance. Next they
must have the Integrity put shareholders first. They must
be Aggressive - in the pursuit of new opportunities and financing
to acquire and explore them. Finally, I like to see management
holds a Large stake in the company. The shareholder's gains
or losses should be, as Warren Buffett puts it, in line with
the success for failures of management. Not like John Roth
who walked away from Nortel with $120 Million, leaving shareholders
holding the bag.
2.
Location, location, location - Even before Bre-x bombed,
we had a preference for stocks of companies exploring in the
Americas. We were and still are hesitant to buy stocks of
companies exploring in corrupt or declining regions such as
Africa and many parts of Asia. The closer to home, the better.
This is not an absolute rule and there will be exceptions
to it. For instance, British Columbia may host exciting new
exploration opportunities, but we now need to be extremely
concerned about Native Land Claims. Then there are other factors
to consider - how remote the property is, how expensive a
deposit might be to develop.
3.
The Target - Investors are looking for companies with
potential for large deposits. In the case of Gold - multi-million
ounce deposits, either bonanza style high grade underground
targets, or large tonnage lower grade open pit situations.
The old prospector's saying - gold is where you find it (i.e.
where it's been found in the past) may sound like a motherhood
statement, but it's true. Of course there is way more to evaluating
a property than that, something we may expand on in a future
issue.
4.
Financing - The company must either already have funds
to carry it through several stages of exploration, the ability
to raise such funds without excessive dilution at low prices,
or the ability to attract a senior mining partner to finance
exploration and possible mine development.
5.
Share Structure - Simply put - the "tighter"
the share structure, the better. In other words the fewer
shares out the better. Also consider what price the company
has been financing operations at in relation to the current
going price for the stock on the open market. Of course the
closer one can buy to the financing prices (which is often
where the insiders buy at) the better.